PROPOSAL FOR REVIEW
PROJECT TITLE: INDIA: SOLAR THERMAL POWER
GEF FOCAL AREA: Climate Change
GEF Eligibility: Under Financial Mechanism of
Convention (Ratification 1/11/93)
Total Project Costs: US$245 million
GEF Financing: US$49 million
Government Counterpart Financing: US$20 million
Co-financing: KfW, amount to be determined;
independent power producer
GEF Operational Focal Point: Department of Economic Affairs,
Ministry of Finance
GEF Implementing Agency: World Bank
Executing Agency: Private Independent Power Producer
(IPP)
Rajasthan Energy Development Agency
(REDA)
Local Counterpart Agencies: Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy
Sources Contact: Mr. Prabhakara,
Secretary
State Government of Rajasthan
Contacts: Mr. S.P. Gupta, Secretary
Department of Mines and Energy
P. Dayal, Chief Executive and
Director
Rajasthan Energy Development Agency
Estimated Starting Date March 1997
(Effectiveness):
Project Duration: Five years
GEF Preparation Costs: $750,000 to $1 million
COUNTRY AND SECTOR BACKGROUND
- India's power sector has a total installed capacity of approximately
77,000 MW of which 65% is coal-based, 28% hydro, and the balance gas and
nuclear-based. Power shortages are estimated at about 10% of total energy and
20% of peak capacity requirements and are likely to increase in the coming
years. For the period FY93 to FY97 nearly 50,000 MW of capacity additions are
required, but due to financial constraints less than 20,000 MW would be
realized. The bulk of capacity additions involve coal thermal stations
supplemented by hydroelectric plant development. Coal-based power involve
environmental concerns relating to emissions of suspended particulate matter
(SPM), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, methane and other
gases. On the other hand, large hydroplants can lead to soil degradation and
erosion, loss of forests, wildlife habitat and species diversity and most
importantly, the displacement of people. To promote environmentally sound
energy investments as well as help mitigate the acute shortfall in power
supply, the Government of India (GOI) is promoting the accelerated development
of the country's renewable energy resources and has made it a priority thrust
area under India's National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP).
- GOI estimates that a potential of 50,000 MW of power capacity can be
harnessed from new and renewable energy sources but due to relatively high
development cost experienced in the past these were not tapped as aggressively
as conventional sources. Nevertheless, development of alternate energy has
been part of GOI's strategy for expanding energy supply and meeting
decentralized energy needs of the rural sector. The program, considered one of
the largest among developing countries, is administered through the Ministry
of Non-Conventional Energy Sources (MNES), energy development agencies in the
various States, and the Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited
(IREDA). During recent years, private sector interest in the renewable energy
sector increased due to several factors: (i) the Government opened the power
sector to private sector participation in 1991; (ii) tax incentives are
offered to developers of renewable energy systems; (iii) there has been a
heightened awareness of the environmental benefits of renewable energy
relative to conventional forms and of the short-gestation period for
developing alternate energy schemes. Recognizing the opportunities afforded by
private sector participation, MNES revised its Eighth Plan priorities in July
1993 by giving greater emphasis on promoting renewable energy technologies for
power generation. Accordingly, Plan targets for power generation from
renewables were raised to 2000 MW, i.e., 500 MW through wind, 600 MW small
hydro, 300MW from bagasse, 40MW solar thermal and the balance from other
bio-energy and solar energy sources. To date, over 550MW of windfarm capacity
has been commissioned under the Eighth Plan bringing the total wind generation
capacity in India to 556MW. About 115 MW capacity of small hydro has so far
been installed with another 216MW under construction. But the sector's
contribution to energy supply while growing is expected to remain a small
fraction of the total requirements of India until such time that operational
experience and cost recovery of investments are more widely achieved to render
the technologies fully commercial.
- Solar Energy. India is located in the equatorial sun belt of the
earth, thereby receiving abundant radiant energy from the sun. The India
Meteorological Department maintains a nationwide network of radiation stations
which measure solar radiation and also the daily duration of sunshine. In most
parts of India, clear sunny weather is experienced 250 to 300 days a year. The
annual global radiation varies from 1600 to 2200 kWh/sq.m. which is comparable
with radiation received in the tropical and sub-tropical regions. The
equivalent energy potential is about 6,000 million GWh of energy per year. The
highest annual global radiation is received in Rajasthan and northern Gujarat.
In Rajasthan, large areas of land are barren and sparsely populated, making
these areas suitable as locations for large central power stations based on
solar energy.
- The Government supports development of both solar thermal and solar
photovoltaics (PV) power generation. To demonstrate and commercialize solar
thermal technology in India, MNES is promoting megawatt scale projects such as
the proposed 35MW solar thermal plant in Rajasthan and is encouraging private
sector projects by providing financial assistance from the Ministry. Parallel
efforts are underway in the area of solar PV in which pilot-scale
grid-connected solar PV power systems (25kW to 100kW) are under trial
operations in addition to stand-alone projects in remote unelectrified areas.
In Rajasthan, the State Government is establishing a solar enterprise zone by
offering a package of incentives to private investors willing to develop
various solar power technologies such as solar thermal and solar PV. An
international tender recently issued by Rajasthan yielded offers for a 50MW
solar PV power station as well as a solar chimney facility to be operated on
an independent power production (IPP) basis.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
- The main objectives of the project are: (a) To demonstrate the operational
viability of parabolic trough solar thermal power generation in India; (b)
promote commercial development of solar thermal technology and cost reduction;
and (c) help reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) global emissions in the short and
longer term. Specifically, operational viability will be demonstrated through
operation of a solar thermal plant by an independent power producer (IPP) with
commercial power sales and delivery arrangements with the grid. Technology
development would be supported through technical assistance and training. The
project would be pursued under GEF's program objective on climate change and
is envisaged as the first step of a long term program for promoting solar
thermal power in India and around the world that would lead to a phased
deployment of similar systems in the country and in other developing nations.
The project would represent the second GEF operation in the energy sector in
India.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
- The project involves: (a) Construction by the private sector of a solar
thermal/fossil-fuel hybrid power plant of about 140MW incorporating a
parabolic trough solar thermal field of 35MW to 40 MW; and (b) Technical
assistance package to support commercialization of solar thermal
technology.
- Investment Component. (See Annex 1) The solar thermal/hybrid power
station will comprise: (i) a solar field with a collection area of 219,000 m2
to support a 35MWe to 40MWe solar thermal plant; and (ii) a power block based
on mature fossil fuel technology. The proposed project will be sited at
Mathania, near Jodhpur, Rajasthan in an arid region. In addition to high solar
insolation levels (5.8 kWh/m2 daily average), the proposed site involves
approximately 800,000 m2 of relatively level land with access to water
resources and electric transmission facilities. The solar thermal/hybrid
station will operate as a base load plant with an expected plant load factor
of 80%. The final choice of the fossil-fired power block would be left to the
bidders, subject to performance parameters set out in the tender
specifications.
- A likely design choice is an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle (ISCC)
involving the integrated operation of the parabolic trough solar plant with a
combined cycle gas turbine using fossil fuels such as fuel oil, low sulfur
heavy stock (LSHS) or naphtha. Such a plant would consist of (i) the solar
field; (ii) a combined cycle power block involving two gas turbines each
connected to a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) and a steam turbine
connected to both HRSG; and (iii) ancillary facilities and plant services such
as fire protection, fuel oil/LSHS/naphtha supply and storage system, grid
interconnection system, water supply and treatment systems, etc. A control
building will house a central microprocessor control system that monitors and
controls plant operations
- Technical assistance: The project will provide technical assistance
to ensure that adequate institutional and logistical support for the
technology is available for future expansion of solar thermal power.
Specifically, funds will be made available for: i) the promotion of solar
thermal technologies among potential investors; ii) operation and maintenance
efficiency improvement program; (iii) monitoring and evaluation of the project
and of overall solar thermal program in India; (iv) staff training and
development of a local consultancy base; v) upgrading of test facilities; and
vi) improved collection and measurement of solar insolation data and other
solar resource mapping activities. Annex 3 presents a summary of the proposed
technical assistance package.
- Status of Preparation. Several studies were prepared since the
eighties which dealt with the development of the first parabolic trough solar
thermal station in the country. In 1994, MNES commissioned a feasibility study
for such a scheme, with a capacity of 35MWe to be situated in Mathania. The
study was prepared by a local engineering firm with technical support from
international solar experts regarding the solar field. This study became the
subject of further review by an engineering consultancy firm engaged by the
State Government of Rajasthan (GOR) in April 1995 and supplemented by an
options study conducted in October 1995 with the assistance of German
consultants funded by KfW. An environmental assessment of the proposed project
is underway, solar field performance requirements are to be further reviewed
by an international expert, and tender specifications and evaluation criteria
finalized. A GEF preparation grant of $750,000 is being applied for to cover
the incremental costs of project preparation.
RATIONALE FOR GEF FINANCING
- The project is consistent with GEF's operational strategy on climate
change in support of long-term mitigation measures. In particular, the project
will help reduce the costs of proven parabolic trough solar technology so as
to enhance its commercial viability. The proposed project is expected to be
the first in a multi-country series of investments which together would
re-commercialize the technology. Similar projects in Mexico, Morocco, and the
United States are in advanced stages of preparation. Additional solar thermal
projects are under consideration in Egypt, Tunisia, Israel, Jordan, Spain,
Italy and Greece (Crete). Other countries in the high insolation regions of
Africa have also shown interest. While not all of these projects are expected
to materialize in the near term, up to four projects including the initiative
in India, are anticipated to be developed within the next five years. The
combined effects of these projects will be to accelerate the process of cost
reduction, demonstrate the technical performance of the technology in a wider
range of climate and market conditions, and create a sustainable market for
parabolic trough solar thermal technology.
- The capital cost of solar thermal power generation technologies is
significantly higher than fossil-based conventional power. Nevertheless, costs
have been falling sharply from $5,000 per kW for the first solar thermal Luz
plant, to $2,900 for the latest Luz plant in California. Recent estimates for
proposed integrated solar combined cycle plants are estimated to be in the
region of $2,000 per kW. The proposed GEF support which will be supplemented
by a financial contribution of $20 million from the Government will directly
help buy-down the installation and associated technology development cost of
the solar power plant to render it competitive with other sources of power in
Rajasthan.
- Demonstrating the solar plant's operational viability under Indian
conditions is expected to result in follow-up investments by the private
sector both in the manufacture of the solar field components and in larger
solar stations within India. Insights into local design and operating factors
such as meteorological and grid conditions, and use of available back-up
fuels, are expected to lead to its replicability under Indian conditions,
opening up avenues for larger deployment of solar power plants in India and
other countries with limited access to cheap competing fuels. Creation of
demand for large scale production of solar facilities will in turn lead to
reductions in costs of equipment supply and operation. It is also expected to
revive and sustain the interest of the international business and scientific
community in improving systems designs and operations of solar thermal plants.
- The Project is expected to result in avoided emissions of 3.1 million
tonnes of carbon over the operating life of the solar thermal plant relative
to generation from a similar-sized coal-fired power station. The cost of
carbon avoidance is estimated at $27 per tonne based on the avoided cost of
$83 million and $15.80 per tonne based on a $49 million GEF grant.
SUSTAINABILITY AND PARTICIPATION
- Government commitment to the project is evidenced by the various studies
commissioned by MNES over the past years and the agreement by the Government
of Rajasthan (GOR) to host this entry project and to provide the land. Support
from the Government is further confirmed by the fact that grant and equity
funding from MNES and GOR, respectively, are being provided to assist in
making the project more attractive to the private sector and permitting the
power output to be sold at a reasonable price to the state utility.
- One of the prime objectives of the demonstration project is to ensure
capacity build-up through 'hands on' experience in the design, operation and
management of such projects under actual field conditions. Involvement in the
project of various players in the energy sector, such as local industries, the
private independent power producer (IPP), Rajasthan State Electricity Board
(RSEB), Rajasthan Energy Development Agency (REDA), MNES and others, will help
to increase the capacity and capability of local technical expertise and
further sustain the development of solar power in India in the longer term.
- Linkage to Power Sector Reforms. The project will be implemented in
the context of on-going reforms in Rajasthan's power sector which calls for
commercializing the sector and attracting private sector investments and
management skills into all new generation facilities. Project sustainability
will depend on to what extent the impact of the initial investment cost is
mitigated, operating costs fully recovered, professional management
introduced, and infrastructure and equipment support for operation and
maintenance made accessible. Accordingly, (a) the solar thermal station
will be operated as an IPP to be managed and jointly owned by the private
sector; (b) subsidy support will be limited to capital costs; (c) fuel input,
power supply and other transactions would be on a commercial basis and backed
up by acceptable marketable contracts; and (d) staff selection and management
would be based on business practices; (e) project site would be situated where
basic infrastructure is well developed and engineering industries established.
However, technology development costs associated with project operations would
be clearly identified and be covered under the technical assistance program.
- To ensure project sustainability, as a condition to appraisal, tariff
adjustments would have to be effected by the Rajasthan State Electricity Board
that would enable the utility to fully meet its cash operating expenses .
Although RSEB raised its tariff by 8% in September 1995, another 10 per cent
increase in average tariff is required to achieve cash break-even. In
addition, agreement will be sought for GOR to implement the set of tariff
reforms along the lines and timetable set forth in the proposed India:
Rajasthan State Power Sector Restructuring Project.
LESSONS LEARNED AND TECHNICAL REVIEW
- GEF and IDA are actively supporting MNES's revised Plan on promoting wind,
solar PV and small hydro technologies through the India: Alternate Energy
Project (GET28633-IN) and associated India: Renewable Resources Development
Project (Cr2449-IN) . The projects were approved by the Board in December 1992
and became effective in April 1993 and involve a line of credit to IREDA to
promote and finance private sector investments in these three sub-sectors.
Favorable prospects for commercialization of an emerging technology in India
is best reflected in the wind sector which saw a rapid growth in installed
capacity in the last three years largely through private sector initiatives.
An industrial base for wind equipment supply and engineering has emerged in
the country with as many as 26 joint venture companies some of which are now
poised to enter the export markets. Moving both the wind and solar PV program
towards the commercial mainstream has involved concerted efforts on the part
of the government and the private sector in removing barriers to marketing,
delivery and operation of these alternate energy systems. These resulted in
establishment of acceptable pricing mechanisms, contractual arrangements,
performance specifications involving agreement among policymakers, power
utilities, manufacturers, financial entities, investors, contractors and
consultants.
- On solar thermal development, key lessons learned from the California
experience are the need for (a) financially credible project developers who
can adequately bear the construction risks; and (b) an incentive structure
that would enable prospective investors to view the operation of the solar
thermal facility as an integral part of their corporate business rather than
as a mere tax shield or marginal investment.
- Technical Review. There are varying claims to superiority in
efficiency of other active solar thermal technologies particularly those that
involve direct steam generation. However, a review of the latest developments
in the solar sector worldwide indicates that the solar parabolic trough LS-3
technology is the most commercially mature among solar thermal power
applications. Similar plants with an aggregate capacity of 354MWe are in
operation in California, USA with plant sizes ranging from 13.8MWe to 80.0MWe.
Moreover, the technology lends itself to hybridization with conventional
fossil-based technologies. A number of options were considered in determining
the location, sizing and hybridization of the project. In addition to
considering an oil-fired rankine cycle engine, consultants reviewed up to 14
ISCC variants, with the 140MW ISCC option yielding the lowest estimated
levelized economic generation cost of Rs2.05 per kWh. The project proposal
incorporates results of the STAP technical review.
PROJECT FINANCING AND BUDGET
- Project Cost: The total investment cost of the project based on an
ISSC facility is estimated at US$240 million excluding interest during
construction (IDC) and taxes. The technical assistance package will involve an
estimated budget of $4.5 million. Of the total plant investment, $66 million
is attributable to development of the solar field, $121 million for fossil
fuel-based power block, and about $52 million for engineering, site
development, and initial working capital requirements. The local cost
component is estimated to account for over 60 per cent of plant investments.
Taxes and duties would involve an additional 10% of project costs and IDC as
much as 14% of investment cost.
- Project Financing. The project is proposed to be financed as
follows: (a) $10 million grant from GOI (Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy
Sources); (b) $10 million equity contribution from the State Government of
Rajasthan (GOR); (c) GEF grant of $49 million to finance the cost of
developing a 35MWe to 40MWe solar plant component and finance the TA package;
(d) equity from the private sector IPP developer; and (e) the balance from
Kreditanstalt fur Wiederaufbau (KfW) in the form of a mixed credit.
INCREMENTAL COSTS
- The solar thermal/fossil-fired hybrid station would be operated on a
base-load mode, with an 80% plant factor. In the absence of the solar thermal
project, the RSEB would continue with its generation expansion plan which
relies heavily on lignite and coal for base-load generation capacity. A
coal-fired plant is therefore taken as the baseline case. The lifecycle
cost of 140MW coal power generating station is estimated at $243 million as
shown in Annex 2, Table 2-1. The estimated costs for the GEF alternative such
as a 140MW ISSC is $326 million as given in Table A-2. This results in an
incremental cost of $83 million.
- The GOI and GOR have pledged grants of approximately $10 million each
towards the Project. Co-financing requested of GEF is $45 million. While the
combined grant contributions do not fully cover the full avoided cost, this is
deemed sufficient given that the Project developer will also be benefiting
from the co-financing terms from KfW.
- The Project would provide a technical
assistance package for promotion of solar technology and lay the
groundwork for replication of the project in other parts of India. In the
absence of the proposed Project, the scale of these activities would have been
very modest, at an estimated baseline level of $500,000 over the Project
period. The TA package is estimated to cost $4.5 million, with the incremental
cost of $4 million proposed for GEF funding.
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
- The project will have positive environmental effects: based on an ISCC
configuration, it will displace 692 thousand tonnes of coal per year, and
consume 181 thousand tonnes of LSHS fuel, resulting in avoided carbon
emissions of 3.1 millions over the operating life of the project. The
potential negative impacts of the project would have to be addressed through a
comprehensive environmental assessment study and recommended mitigation
plan which would have to be completed before appraisal. Particular
attention would have to be given on the fuel handling and storage arrangements
for the conventional power block. While displacement of population is not
expected to arise, land aquisition process would be reviewed to ensure
compliance with legal requirements.
ISSUES, ACTIONS AND RISKS
- There are at least four areas of project risks. First, there is the
financial and operational risk that the project fails to attract IPP
developers who are financially and technically capable to complete the project
and to manage the plant efficiently so as maintain sound financial operations.
Second, there is a technical risk that the technology may not work properly in
the Indian context. For instance, climatological conditions such as haze and
sand storms may affect the performance of critical components of the power
plant. Also, the maintenance and operation of critical solar equipment and
controls may prove to be too complex. Third, there is the economic risk that
the application of the technology in India may be more costly than
anticipated, making it completely unaffordable. Fourth, there is the
replicability risk that, even if the demonstration project works as planned,
the project may not lead to its replication in India. This may be due to lack
of proper policy instruments or economic resources, or simply because the
conditions do not bring about a sufficiently large decrease in the production
costs.
- The financial and operational risk will be addressed by carefully
structuring the IPP solicitation process to ensure that only financially sound
and technically qualified developers are included. Requirements for risk
capital contribution, performance guarantees and plant management arrangements
would be established in the tenders. Other risks are being minimized through
comprehensive feasibility studies of the project to assess project cost and
performance under different operating scenarios. In addition, close monitoring
of project implementation and operation will be undertaken in order to
introduce early corrective actions which can lead to reduction in costs and
improvements in plant performance. Finally, rigorous evaluation of project
performance will be undertaken and feedback provided to policy planners,
utilities, manufacturers, and research community. The information will also be
made available to other countries in the region to help create favorable
conditions for investments in solar thermal power in other developing
countries and thus help bring down cost of equipment supply.
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
- This will be the first time that a parabolic trough solar thermal plant
would be pursued through competitive bidding. The IPP process will consist of
having the State Government of Rajasthan issue a Request for Proposal (RFP)
for a power plant to be located at Mathania with an aggregate capacity of
about 140MW having a 35 to 40MWe solar plant component. Choice of secondary
fuel for the power block will be left to the bidder. The amount and terms of
financing available from GEF, the Central and State Government and KfW will be
stated in the RFP. In order to firm up the project cost and secure the most
appropriate blend of financing, it is recommended that early procurement
action be taken. Sufficient lead time will need to be given to the bidders to
prepare their technical proposals and a well defined draft power purchase
agreement (PPA) issued at time of tender to enable the participants to bid
aggressively. Appraisal would take place only after the price bids are
opened and project costs firmed up. Negotiations will commence when the
winning bidder is known to allow finalization of financing package. The
GEF and government grant components would however remain as announced at time
of tender.
- The project is to operate autonomously as an IPP and would sell power to
the grid based on a commercial power purchase agreement (PPA) with RSEB.
Ideally, the purchase price will be fixed in a manner to enable the IPP to
repay its loan obligations as well as meet all its operating expenses. A
suitable escalation provision in the sale price will also be needed to ensure
that the revenue stream of the IPP does not suffer because of inflation.
Competitive bids for fuel oil/naphtha-based IPP plants for various load
centers of Rajasthan including the Jodhpur area have been evaluated yielding
prices ranging from Rs2.10 to Rs2.40 per kWh. This will serve as initial
benchmark for the short-term avoided cost currently faced by the grid. While
fiscal incentives during project start-up would be beneficial to the IPP,
operating subsidy support would be avoided. At the minimum, project revenues
should be sufficient to meet cash operating expenses even if full recovery of
capital costs is not achieved.
- Operation and Maintenance . The O&M arrangement would need to
be clearly spelt out in the bid offer. Maintenance needs of the conventional
(power block) part of the project, including turbines, heat exchangers,
electrical equipment, etc., can readily be met within India. For the solar
field operation and maintenance, staff exposure and intensive training at the
solar thermal power plants in Kramer Junction, USA may be necessary.
- Monitoring and Evaluation. It is proposed that the Government of
Rajasthan would engage the services of local and international consultants to
monitor and evaluate the progress of project implementation and performance
from start of plant construction through the initial plant operating period.
In addition, progress of technical assistance activities would also be
monitored and reviewed. Regular progress reports on all components of the
project would be prepared and submitted to GEF and KfW including to the
scientific community and members of the Indian and international solar energy
industry. A formal mid-term project review would be conducted jointly by the
Bank and KfW midway through the project implementation period.
- Training. Due to the demonstration nature of the project,
continuous involvement of technical institutions such as MNES's Solar Energy
Center, Indian Institutes of Technologies, consultancy firms and other related
institutions is also expected. The project will also benefit from the
expertise available at other organizations, e.g., SANDIA National Laboratories
and NREL in USA, and other research and training institutions in Israel and
Spain.
WORK PROGRAM
PROPOSED FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL
GEF/C.7
GEF Council
Meetings
Return to GEF Home Page
Menu