{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":12,"sheets":["Support","Register","Risk Taxonomy","Risk Likelihood & Impact","Risk Treatment","Risk Appetite Statement","Guidance for GEF-GCF projects","(3) Taxonomy","(4) Likelihood & Impact","(5) Treatment","Feuil1","(5) Monitoring Treatment"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":6,"macros":1,"external_links":5,"defined_names":58,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Support","index":0,"n_rows":8,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":8,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[1,1,1,6],[3,1,3,6],[5,1,5,6],[7,1,7,6]]}
[]
[null,"Support"]
[]
[null,"Support and assistance can be sought through contacting IUCN Risk Officer Eric Martrou at eric.martrou@iucn.org or your Regional MEL Coordinator\n"]
[]
[null,"Guidance"]
[]
[null,"Use the risk register to structure your project-risks using the guidance provided (see red tabs):\n- Risk taxonomy\n- Risk likelihood and impact criteria\n- Risk treatment definitions\n- Risk Appetite Statement\n- Specific guidance for GEF / GCF projects"]

{"sheet":"Register","index":1,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":15,"rows_kept":17,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,14]]}
["IUCN PROJECT RISK REGISTER"]
["ID","Risk title","Category \nSelect taxonomy level I","Sub-category \nSelect taxonomy level II","Risk description\nEnter a brief description of the risk. Risk description should include the event and the cause","Consequence/Impact\nIf this risk occurs what could be its consequences/impacts on ?","Likelihood \n1 Unlikely\n2 Possible\n3 Likely\n4 Almost certain","Impact\n1 Minor\n2 Intermediate\n3 Extensive \n4 Extreme","TOTAL SCORE\n(1-16)\nNo action required","RISK LEVEL\nNo action required","Risk Appetite\nSelect adequate statement","Risk Treatment\nSelect adequate risk treatment"," Mitigations Measures\nIndicate what actions have been taken/will be taken to manage this risk. Each risk can have multiple treatment measures. ","Progress on mitigation measures\nProvide the status of the implementation of mitigation measures (Pending, On track, Done) ","Risk Owner\nIndicate the person, unit or entity with the responsibility to manage the risk."]
["R1",null,"External",null,"Climate variability e.g. drought, cyclones storm surges","Directly impacts activity implementation and is heavily dependent on severity of natural disaster) ",2,3,{"$f":"IF(G3=\"NR\",\"NR\",IF(H3=\"NR\",\"NR\",PRODUCT(G3:H3)))","v":6},{"$f":"IF(I3=\"NR\",\"UNRATED\",IF(I3>=9,\"HIGH\",IF(I3>=6,\"MEDIUM\",\"LOW\")))","v":"MEDIUM"},"Medium","Mitigate/Treat","1. Special attention to the impacts of recovery and post disaster actions in priority protected areas \n2.\n",null,"DEPC, PMU"]
["R2",null,"Operational",null,"Limited Understanding of and commitment to the value of an expanded and representative protected areas network ","Affect meeting overall project objectives",1,2,2,{"$f":"IF(I4=\"NR\",\"UNRATED\",IF(I4>=9,\"HIGH\",IF(I4>=6,\"MEDIUM\",\"LOW\")))","v":"LOW"},"Low","Tolerate/Monitor","1. Awareness and information campaign designed and Implemented (Outputs 2.2, 2.3). The increase of visibility of protected areas resulting from project activities should significantly increase the interest for conservation which is problematic in Vanuatu (Outputs 1.1, 1.3, 2.2, 2.3, 3.1)\n2.\n",null,"Ministry of Climate Change, DEPC, PMU"]
["R3",null,"Operational",null,"Low level of cooperation and coordination between stakeholders (between relevant sectors and between central and decentralized administration)  ","Directly impacts activity implementation and could delay implementation due to the reluctance of stakeholder to cooperate / coorindate, in the long run affects meeting overall project objectives within the project period",2,2,4,"LOW","Low","Tolerate/Monitor","1. The joint involvement of the different relevant sectors in most of project activities should lead to better cross-sector integration and new synergies. (Outputs 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, 3.1). Systematic information and the involvement of decentralized entities must also foster a good cross-sectoral integration at the local level (Output 1.3, Output 2.3, 3.3). Outputs of the component 4 will bring additional support to ensure cooperation and coordination between stakeholders \n2.\n",null,"Ministry of Climate Change, DEPC, Relevant sectoral departments (Forestry, Fisheries, Agriculture), ECARE coordination, Decentralized authorities (Province, Area Councils) "]
["R4",null,"Operational",null,"Weak implementation capacity at the local and institutional levels  ","Delay in implementation of activities, further achieving overall project objectives",3,2,6,"MEDIUM","Medium","Mitigate/Treat","1. Capacity building through innovative approaches (peer to peer, learning by doing) constitutes a major part of project activities. (Output 3.3). Most of the activities are rooted in traditional knowledge and practices relaying on already existing good practices (Outputs 1.3, 2.1, 3.3)\n2.\n",null,"Ministry of Climate Change, DEPC, PMU "]
["R5",null,"Legal_Compliance",null,"Delays for the preparation of designation and/or registration documentation","Affects meeting overall project objectives",2,2,4,"LOW","Low","Tolerate/Monitor","1. Respective requirements for the preparation of designation/registration documentation for each registered CCA must be tailored according to the specifics of the CCA and the Area Council. (Outputs 1.2, 2.2, 2.3) \n2.\n",null,"Ministry of Climate Change, DEPC, ECPMU "]
["R6",null,"Financial",null,"Delays in work plan and procurement plans validation and disbursements ","Delay in workplan and procurement plans validation and disbursements impact activity implementation and could cause delays",2,2,{"$f":"IF(G8=\"NR\",\"NR\",IF(H8=\"NR\",\"NR\",PRODUCT(G8:H8)))","v":4},"LOW","Low","Tolerate/Monitor","1. Guarantee the fluidity of administrative and project management IUCN procedures (Component 4)\n2.\n",null,"IUCN Oceania Regional Office, Ministry of Climate Change, PMU "]
["R7",null,"Strategic",null,"Poor reliability of rapid assessment outputs ","Affects quality of analysis, potentially poses risk to target audience / area",2,2,4,"LOW","Low","Tolerate/Monitor","1. Special attention must be given to the field survey methodology quality (Output 1.3), based on existing Melanesia adapted surveys.  \n2.\n",null,"PMU, Survey contractors\n"]
["R8",null,"Operational",null,"Poor project delivery ","Affects meeting overall project objectives",1,3,3,"LOW","Low","Tolerate/Monitor","1. Institution structure and coordination meetings, Mid-term evaluation, Annual audits \n2.\n",null,"PMU, Ministry of Climate Change\n"]
["R9",null,"External",null,"Changing priorities of the government  ","Affects meeting overall project objectives",1,4,{"$f":"IF(G11=\"NR\",\"NR\",IF(H11=\"NR\",\"NR\",PRODUCT(G11:H11)))","v":4},"LOW","Low","Tolerate/Monitor","1. Institution structure and coordination meetings   \n2. \n",null,"PMU, Ministry of Climate Change\n"]
["R10",null,"External",null,"Weak engagement of government participants  ","Affects meeting overall project objectives",2,2,{"$f":"IF(G12=\"NR\",\"NR\",IF(H12=\"NR\",\"NR\",PRODUCT(G12:H12)))","v":4},"LOW","Low","Tolerate/Monitor","1. Institution structure and coordination meetings, Mid-term evaluation, Close engagement of ECARE Coordination with Ministry of Climate Change \n2.\n",null,"PMU, Ministry of Climate Change\n"]
["R11",null,"External",null,"Lack of potential training candidates in government ","Affects meeting overall project objectives",3,1,3,"LOW","Low","Tolerate/Monitor","1. Close engagement of ECARE Coordination with Ministry of Climate Change \n2.\n",null,"PMU, Ministry of Climate Change\n"]
["R12",null,"External",null,"Covid-19 disruptions to project implementation","Directly impacts activity implementation and is heavily dependent on severity of the spread and containment of the disease ",2,2,4,"LOW","Low","Tolerate/Monitor","1. The current global health crisis associated with COVID 19 has the potential to redirect the attention and resources of the Government of Vanuatu and other stakeholders towards this challenge and affect the overall operations of the project. As of October 2020, Vanuatu remains Covid-free. Travel within Vanuatu remains unaffected.  Travel to Vanuatu by outside experts, the Chief Technical Advisor (if not currently in Solomon Islands) and other consultants will be difficult for the foreseeable future. Efforts will be made to mitigate this through prioritising local consultants, hiring local liaisons for outside consultants, and utilising virtual meetings.  The project has integrated adaptive management instruments into its design and will apply these instruments to adapt as necessary to this risk. The inception workshop will be used to review the results framework and project timeline to determine if there is a need to make any adjustments due to operational challenges, funding, stakeholder involvement and partnerships as a result of the global health situation. The quarterly and annual reporting and review process will also be used to assure the project is able to adapt in a timely means. In addition, the Stakeholder Engagement Plan will be reviewed and finalized at project inception. As necessary, adjustments to the means and timing of engagement will be made to assure that relevant stakeholder groups are able to be represented and participate in key consultation and decision-making processes. The knowledge management and communication strategy and associated activities proposed for knowledge management at the landscape, cross-landscape, national and regional levels will also be developed taking into consideration the latest available information and guidance on social distancing.  \n2.\n",null,"PMU, Ministry of Climate Change\n"]
["R13",null,null,null,null,null,"NR","NR","NR","UNRATED",null,null,"1.\n2.\n"]
["R14",null,null,null,null,null,"NR","NR","NR","UNRATED",null,null,"1.\n2.\n"]
["R15",null,null,null,null,null,"NR","NR","NR","UNRATED",null,null,"1.\n2.\n"]

{"sheet":"Risk Taxonomy","index":2,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[1,1,1,7],[2,1,2,7]]}
[]
[null,"IUCN Risk Taxonomy"]
[null,"The risk taxonomy (or risk inventory) is a comprehensive and institution-wide categorization of risk types faced by the organization and mapped across IUCN’s functions. It contains a three level structure, as shown below, whereby risks higher in the hierarchy are decomposed into more specific and granular events. Third level are examples of risk areas.\n\nThe IUCN risk taxonomy serves as common language on risk which managers and staff can use at all the levels of the organization. By providing a comprehensive set of risk categories, it encourages those involved in risk identification to consider all types of risks that could affect the organization's objectives.\n\n"]

{"sheet":"Risk Likelihood & Impact","index":3,"n_rows":9,"n_cols":12,"rows_kept":9,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[1,1,2,9],[8,11,12,15],[13,2,13,8]]}
[]
[null,"Determining Risk Likelihood and Impact at project level"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"The overall impact across the different consequences of a risk is based on the highest level of impact \n\n(e.g. all consequences have impact scores of 2 except for ''operational'' that has a score of 4 - then the overall Impact for that risk is 4) "]

{"sheet":"Risk Treatment","index":4,"n_rows":11,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":11,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[1,1,1,2],[3,1,3,2],[10,1,10,2]]}
[]
[null,"Risk Treatment"]
[]
[null,"For each High or Medium level risk, one or more risk mitigation measures must be identified. Risk treatments are comprised of four types: "]
[]
[null,"Tolerate/Monitor","Accept the risk if the opportunities outweigh the risk. The risk owner should, however, continue to monitor the risk"]
[null,"Treat/Mitigate","Reduce the impact, likelihood or both and/or improve the existing controls or develop new mitigations to reduce the risk to acceptable levels"]
[null,"Transfer","Move the risk so that a third party takes on the responsibility for an aspect of the threat"]
[null,"Terminate/Avoid","Avoid the risk by not undertaking the programme/project activity(ies) associated with the risk or changing the scope, procurement process, partner or sequence of activities, among others depending on the type of risk"]
[]
[null,"The primary goal of risk treatment is to prepare and document specific responses (mitigation actions), timelines, and indicators to monitor the risks and assign owners to the risks. \nThe risk owner is responsible for the management of all activities associated with the efforts to reduce the risks to acceptable levels."]

{"sheet":"Risk Appetite Statement","index":5,"n_rows":8,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":8,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
[]
[null,"Risk category","Risk appetite level","Statements"]
[null,"STRATEGIC\n\nIn keeping with its Mission Statement, IUCN’s strategic planning process aims to ensure that strategic positioning, programme relevance, programme effectiveness, finances and global operations are sustainable and support programmatic delivery. ","MEDIUM","As a Union, IUCN has NO appetite for deviations from its statutes and policies, which could do damage to its values, mission, or reputation.\n\nIUCN has NO appetite for risks of causing harm to nature, the environment, and the people.\n\nIUCN has HIGH appetite for exploring innovative approaches; new fundraising activities; running ambitious projects; developing partnerships if these are in line with IUCN programme and if the benefits and opportunities outweigh the risks (otherwise, the appetite is MEDIUM)."]
[null,"FINANCIAL\n\nIUCN must remain financially sustainable to continue to serve its purpose and achieve its vision and mission.","MEDIUM","IUCN has NO appetite for activities that will breach financial rules, procedures and / or internal controls.\n\nIUCN has LOW appetite for incurring financial losses across its operations worldwide. \n\nIUCN has MEDIUM appetite to dedicate a certain part of funding for exploring new avenues to diversify revenue streams through partnerships with non-traditional partners and/or donors\n\nIUCN has HIGH appetite to invest in opportunities and strategic initiatives that align and promote IUCN’s vision and mission and are supported by robust business cases and associated financial information."]
[null,"PEOPLE MANAGEMENT\n\nIUCN should refrain from putting employees in situation where safety and security are not guaranteed. IUCN is committed to exploring strategies to attract, manage, develop and retain skilled staff to meet its strategic objectives.","LOW","IUCN has NO appetite to deviate from its core values and standards with respect to equality, diversity, and dignity. \n\nIUCN has MEDIUM to HIGH appetite to invest and retain in its workforce through robust recruitment process, future-focused competency framework, and innovative staff management tools that are aligned with its strategic priorities and programme needs.\n\nIUCN has LOW appetite for operations that put staff at risk of harm. IUCN will maintain offices in locations as long as the organisation can balance the likelihood for security breaches with risk mitigations such as staff evacuation protocols and allocation of additional security resources.\n\nIUCN has LOW appetite for undertaking field visits in high security-risk countries and areas in accordance with IUCN Global Safety and Security Policy. "]
[null,"OPERATIONAL\n\nIUCN must have comprehensive operational systems, practices and partnerships that support the achievement of its strategic objectives. IUCN implements its strategic objectives through a diverse and large global and regional programme and project portfolios.","MEDIUM","IUCN has NO appetite to collaborate with partners that are not in alignment with IUCN values and policies (e.g. Code of Conduct and Professional Ethics, Policy on the Protection from Sexual Exploitation, Sexual Abuse, and Sexual Harassment).\n\nIUCN has MEDIUM appetite for implementing and executing ambitious projects when aligned with its programme and portfolio strategic priorities. Rigorous programme and project management standards must be applied at all times.\n\nIUCN has MEDIUM appetite when engaging with new partners for implementing activities or delivering new services and products to continually improve IUCN presence, expertise and value proposition. These partners must successfully pass the institutional due diligence process.\n\n"]
[null,"LEGAL & COMPLIANCE\n\nIUCN adheres to relevant statutory and policy requirements in all locations where IUCN operates. ","NO","IUCN has NO appetite for non-compliance with relevant IUCN’s statutory and policy requirements in all locations where IUCN operates. \n\nIUCN has NO appetite for misconduct, harassment or discrimination and non-compliance behaviour that undermines the integrity of IUCN.\n\nIUCN has NO appetite for non-compliance with relevant data protection regulations in the countries where IUCN operates.\n\nIUCN has NO appetite for risks such as fraud, unethical conduct, or non-compliance with legislation that could impact our reputation and stakeholder confidence. \n"]
[null,"INFORMATION SYSTEMS\n\nIUCN embraces technological innovations while being equipped with innovative security and IS delivery.","LOW","IUCN has LOW appetite for risks that could affect IS infrastructures, business operations productivity or system downtime.\n\nIUCN has MEDIUM appetite while adopting innovative technologies to drive practices that are more efficient and to support programme innovation."]

{"sheet":"Guidance for GEF-GCF projects","index":6,"n_rows":15,"n_cols":6,"rows_kept":15,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[1,1,1,2],[1,4,1,5]]}
[]
[null,"The table below illustrates how the risk categories used by GEF/GCF and IUCN align with one another.",null,null,"The table below illustrates how the risk rating/level used by GEF/GCF and IUCN align with one another."]
[]
[null,"GEF risk categories","IUCN risk categories",null,"GEF risk rating / level","IUCN risk rating / level"]
[null,"Climate","External",null,"High","High"]
[null,"Environment & Social","Part of ESMS risk assessment",null,"Substantial","High"]
[null,"Political and Governance","External",null,"Moderate","Medium"]
[null,"Macro-economic","External",null,"Low","Low"]
[null,"Strategies and policies","Strategic"]
[null,"Technical design of project or program","Operational"]
[null,"Institutional capacity for implementation and sustainability","Operational"]
[null,"Fiduciary: financial management and procurement","Finance"]
[null,"Stakeholder engagement","Part of ESMS risk assessment"]
[null,"Other","People management; Legal / Compliance; Information systems"]
[null,"Financial risks for NGI projects","N/A"]

{"sheet":"(3) Taxonomy","index":7,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[1,1,1,14],[2,1,2,14]]}
[]
[null,"IUCN Risk Taxonomy"]
[null,"The risk taxonomy (or risk inventory) is a comprehensive and institution-wide categorization of risk types faced by the organization and mapped across IUCN’s functions. It contains a three level structure, as shown below, whereby risks higher in the hierarchy are decomposed into more specific and granular events. \n\nThe IUCN risk taxonomy serves as common language on risk which managers and staff can use at all the levels of the organization. By providing a comprehensive set of risk categories, it encourages those involved in risk identification to consider all types of risks that could affect the organization's objectives.\n\n"]

{"sheet":"(4) Likelihood & Impact","index":8,"n_rows":14,"n_cols":18,"rows_kept":14,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[6,11,6,12],[0,2,0,7],[1,1,1,8],[1,10,2,18],[12,8,13,8],[10,2,10,8],[7,11,12,11],[13,11,13,17],[19,3,22,3],[23,3,25,3],[19,6,22,6],[12,7,13,7],[26,6,28,6],[26,3,28,3],[26,4,28,4],[26,5,28,5],[12,4,13,4],[12,5,13,5],[12,6,13,6],[12,2,13,3],[14,2,43,2],[14,4,14,8],[15,4,15,8],[16,4,16,8],[23,6,25,6],[26,7,28,7],[23,7,25,7],[17,4,17,8],[19,4,22,4],[19,5,22,5],[19,7,22,7],[19,8,22,8],[14,3,18,3],[26,8,28,8],[29,3,35,3],[36,3,43,3],[29,4,35,4],[29,5,35,5],[29,6,35,6],[29,8,35,8],[36,4,43,4],[36,5,43,5],[36,6,43,6],[36,7,43,7],[36,8,43,8],[29,7,35,7],[23,4,25,4],[23,5,25,5]]}
[]
[null,"Determining Likelihood and Impact at Project Level",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Determining Likelihood and Impact at Unit (region, centre, corporate)\nand Institutional Levels"]
[]
[null,null,"Likelihood","Not likely\n1","Low likelihood\n2","Moderately likely\n3","Highly likely\n4","Expected\n5",null,null,null,null,"Likelihood","Not likely\n1","Low likelihood\n2","Moderately likely\n3","Highly likely\n4","Expected\n5"]
[null,null,"Description (“The risk is expected to materialize….”)","Every 5 years or less\nand/or \nvery low chance (<20%) of materializing","Every 3-5 years\nand/or\nlow chance \n(20% - 40%) of materializing","Every 1-3 years  and/or \nmoderate chance (40% -60%) of\nmaterializing ","Once or twice a year  \nand/or\nhigh chance (60%- 80%) of materializing ","Several times a year  \nand/or \n very high chance of materializing (> 80%)",null,null,null,null,"Description (“The risk is expected to materialize….”)","Every 5 years or less\nand/or \nvery low  chance (<20%) of materializing","Every 3-5 years\nand/or\nlow chance\n(20% - 40%) of materializing","Every 1-3 years  and/or \nmedium chance\n(40% - 60%) of materializing ","Once or twice a year  and/or\nhigh chance  (60%- 80%) of materializing","Several times a year  and/or \nvery high chance of materializing (> 80%)"]
[]
[null,null,"Impact","Negligible\n1","Minor\n2","Intermediate\n3","Extensive\n4","Extreme\n5",null,null,null,"Impact",null,"Negligible\n1","Minor\n2","Intermediate\n3","Extensive\n4","Extreme\n5"]
[null,null,"Description\n(“If the risk materializes…”)\n","Negligible/no impact on project results/outcomes.\nNegligible or no  impact on implementation and budget.","5-20 % of the applicable and planned results/outcomes. Minor impact on implementation and budget.","20-30% of the applicable and planned results/outcomes. Medium impact on implementation and budget.","30-50% of the applicable and planned results/outcomes. Potential adverse impact on implementation and budget","More than 5O% of the applicable and planned results/outcome.\nAdverse impact on implementation and budget",null,null,null,"Description of Consequence","Financial ","<5 % deviation from applicable budget","5-10 % deviation from applicable budget","10-20% deviation from applicable budget","20-50% deviation from applicable budget",">50% deviation from applicable budget"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Results / Outcomes","Negligible/no impact on results/outcomes","5-20 % of the applicable and planned results/outcomes","20-30% of the applicable and planned results/outcomes","30-50% of the applicable and planned results/outcomes","More than 5O% of the applicable and planned results/outcomes "]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Operations","Delay of applicable operations/activities by 1-2 days","Delay of applicable operations/activities 2-7 days","Delay of applicable operations/activities 1-4 weeks","Delay operations/activities for one month or longer","Permanent shift in applicable operations/activities"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Compliance","Negligible deviation from applicable policies and/or regulations","Moderate deviation from applicable policies and/or regulations","Deviation from applicable policies and/or regulations","Significant deviation from applicable policies and/or regulations","Major deviation from applicable policies and/or regulations"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Safety & Security","No Effect on IUCN Personnel,\nand/or\nNo effect on IUCN operations and programme","Slightly Injurious Effect on IUCN Personnel\nand/or\ninjuries to general population directly or indirectly caused by IUCN actions","Moderately Injurious or Psychologically Traumatic Effect and/or\nmajor injuries to general population directly or indirectly caused by IUCN actions","Fatal (individual or small numbers), Severely Injurious or Severely Psychologically Traumatic Effect\nand/or \nloss of life to\ngeneral population\ndirectly or indirectly caused by IUCN actions","Catastrophically Fatal Effect (mass casualties)\nand/or \nloss of life to\ngeneral population\ndirectly or indirectly caused by IUCN actions"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Reputation","Isolated negative comments from external stakeholders","Several negative comments from external stakeholders","Negative reports/articles in national, regional\nand/or \ninternational media","Negative reports/articles in several national, regional\nand/or \ninternational media for a period of a week or more, and/or criticism from key stakeholders","Negative reports/articles in several national, regional\nand/or \ninternational media for a period of a month or more, and/or strong criticism from key stakeholders"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"The overall impact across the different consequences of a risk is then based on the highest level of impact (e.g. if one of the consequences has an impact of 5, then the overall Impact for that risk is 5) ."]

{"sheet":"(5) Treatment","index":9,"n_rows":11,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":11,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[10,1,10,2],[3,1,3,2],[1,1,1,2]]}
[]
[null,"Risk Treatment"]
[]
[null,"For each Very High, High or Medium level risk, one or more risk treatment measures must be identified. Risk treatments are comprised of four types: "]
[]
[null,"Tolerate","Accept the risk if the opportunities outweigh the risk. The risk owner should, however, continue to monitor the risk"]
[null,"Treat/Mitigate","Reduce the impact, likelihood or both and/or improve the existing controls or develop new controls to reduce the risk to acceptable levels"]
[null,"Transfer","Move the risk so that a third party takes on the responsibility for an aspect of the threat"]
[null,"Terminate","Avoid the risk by not undertaking the programme activity(ies) associated with the risk or changing the scope, procurement process, supplier or sequence of activities, among others depending on the type of risk"]
[]
[null,"The primary goal of risk treatment is to prepare and document specific management responses (mitigation actions), timelines, and indicators to monitor the risks and assign owners to the risks. \nThe risk owner is responsible for the management of all activities associated with the efforts to reduce the risks to acceptable levels."]

{"sheet":"Feuil1","index":10,"n_rows":22,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":22,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Strategic","Financial","People_Management","Operational","Legal_Compliance","Digital","External","1 Not likely","1 Negligible "]
["Governance","Financial_sustainability","Staffing","Programme_execution","Violation_of_laws_&_regulations","Digital_&_IT_delivery","Geopolitical","2 Low likelyhood","2 Minor"]
["Organizational_efficiency_&_sustainability","Financial_operations","Talent_management","Partnering_with_others","Fraud_&_corruption","Data_&_information_management","Economic","3 Moderate likelyhood","3 Intermediate"]
["Transformation_and_change",null,"Staff_health_security_and _safety","Communication_&_reputation","Donor_compliance","Data_protection_&_IT_security","Environmental","4 High likelyhood","4 Extensive "]
["Value proposition","Income (funding)","Strategic workforce planning","Operational capacity & performance","Compliance to local law (labour)","Overall strategy & alignment",null,"5 Expected","5 Extreme"]
["Foresight and vision capacity","Expenses (budget implementation)","Recruitment strategies & process","Programme relevance, quality & results","Compliance to international laws","Digital Transformation execution"]
["Strategy relevance & alignment","Cost recovery","Appropriate staffing","Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning","Anti money laundering","Performance & adoption"]
["Strategy execution & monitoring","Financial reporting & auditability","Minor/gross misconduct","Procurement","Anti-bribery violations","IT operations & service delivery"]
["Efficiency and effectiveness of IUCN Council and its Committees","Investment","People management & leadership skills","Business continuity","Restrictive measure (sanctions)","3rd party"]
["Members engagement","Treasury management","Staff development & upskilling","Systems and processes","Bribery","Data Governance"]
["Budgeting & allocation of resources","Asset & Lease management","Employee turn-over","Compliance and oversight","Misuse of assets","Inability to trace information"]
["Policy setting","Payroll disbursement & accounting","Recognition & rewards","Execution Capacity","Code of conduct","Data protection"]
["Relevance/efficiency of organizational structure & operating model","Travel management","Onboarding","Implementation Arrangements","Donor requirements management","Cyber security "]
["IUCN offices legal status","Loans","Performance management","Due Diligence","Donor reporting requirements"]
["Organizational development steering","Accounts payable","Staff well-being","Compliance Clauses"]
["Innovation culture & capacity","Procurement","Mental health & Stress","Reputation of Private Sectors"]
["Project portfolio management",null,"Physical health","Reputational risks (internal & external)"]
["Org capacity & agility to absorb internal & external changes",null,"Crime & banditry","Defamation of IUCN"]
[null,null,"Civil unrest","Controversies over corporate partners or suppliers"]
[null,null,"Environmental hazards"]
[null,null,"Transportation safety"]
[null,null,"Premises safety"]

{"sheet":"(5) Monitoring Treatment","index":11,"n_rows":20,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":20,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[18,1,18,3],[19,1,19,3],[8,1,8,3],[13,1,13,3],[0,0,0,3],[4,0,5,0],[4,1,5,1],[4,2,5,2],[14,1,14,3],[15,1,15,3],[16,1,16,3],[17,1,17,3]]}
["Risk Management Form"]
[]
["Risk ID & Title","Please insert ID & risk title"]
[]
["Risk Owner","Please insert your name","Date"]
[]
[]
[]
["IMPLEMENTATION"]
["Actions needed for mitigation:","Resources required","Responsible person","Date of implementation"]
[]
[]
[]
["REVIEW"]
["Scheduled review date: "]
["Are all mitigation measures in place?"]
["Are measures eliminating or minimising the risk?"]
["Are there any new problems with the risk?"]
["Review by: (name)"]
["Review date:"]